« Blogging 1.0 | Main | Union Square Ventures »
VC Cliché of the Week
We were in a meeting yesterday and were talking about patents.
We were debating the usefulness of patents as a business matter and I dropped my favorite line about patents on the group.
Patents are like nuclear bombs, you just got to have some.
I have never seen patents make a business, but I have seen lack of patents hurt a business on many occasions.
So this line, given to me by a patent lawyer about ten years ago now, strikes a chord in me.
IP battles are like the cold war. Those who have patents can keep others honest because nobody wants to start a war that might end in everyone's destruction. But those who have no patents are sitting ducks and don't have the weapons to keep others honest.
So my advice to entrepreneurs is always file a bunch of patents. But don't expect that they'll ever do more than keep others at bay.
February 9, 2005 in Venture Capital and Technology | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5934/1805653
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference VC Cliché of the Week:
» Patents for the Belgians from Minh’s Notes
Generally speaking, those in the free/open source software community detest patents, IP claims, and other such nonsense, because they really infringe on our creativity. But I’ve ... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 9, 2005 9:48:15 PM
» patents are good for something... from waves in the aether
... or eloquently stating the obvious
In his blog Fred puts patents in perspective. [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 9, 2005 10:12:43 PM
» Patents for the Belgians from Minh’s Notes
Generally speaking, those in the free/open source software community detest patents, IP claims, and other such nonsense, because they really infringe on our creativity. But I’ve ... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 9, 2005 11:22:27 PM
» One venture capitalist's patent cliche from Patent Chronicles
"Patents are like nuclear bombs, you just got to have some." Fred Wilson is a frequent blogger, and expounds on patents for startups on his blog. Another good quote from him: "I have never seen patents make a business, but I have seen lack of patent... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 2, 2005 11:05:00 PM
» Dan Bricklin on Patenting Visicalc from Feld Thoughts
Dan Bricklin has a thoughtful post on software patents as a follow up to a bunch of stuff that’s gone around the web the past few weeks since the NY Times article on Microsoft’s quest for patents. Buried in Dan’s post is th... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 15, 2005 2:04:51 AM
» Dan Bricklin on Patenting Visicalc from Feld Thoughts
Dan Bricklin has a thoughtful post on software patents as a follow up to a bunch of stuff that’s gone around the web the past few weeks since the NY Times article on Microsoft’s quest for patents. Buried in Dan’s post is th... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 15, 2005 2:05:48 AM
» Abolish Software Patents from Feld Thoughts
I spoke on a panel last week at the Silicon Flatirons Telecommunications Program titled Re-examining The Patent System. My panel was the last one and came after a few hours of stimulating discussion about the problems with patents, ... [Read More]
Tracked on May 18, 2006 3:42:58 AM
Comments
Hey Fred,
I agree that patents can be a useful speed bump to slow down competitors. My biggest problem with patents from a business standpoint is the expense of defending them. In the early stages of any business, cash is obviously in critical short supply. Spending that capital on patents before gaining access to VC funding can sound like a good idea (VCs do tend to like defensible IP), but the problem is that patents are useless unless you have the financial capacity to defend them. If Google uses your model to exploit a market opportunity and you have the patent on that business process, technology, etc. good luck prevailing without the financial resources to at least go through the first couple of rounds with Google's legal team. It seems to me that patents are one of the first things that a VC should be pushing for once the business has achieved enough traction to generate revenue (and likely future earnings) and therefore justify investment, but doing so beforehand makes too many assumptions about the overall importance of the IP most entrepreneurs seek to protect.
Posted by: Alex Rowland | Feb 10, 2005 2:13:15 AM
I agree with Alex, however start-ups can file a provisional patent w/o attorneys for $100. My start-up met with about 10 attorneys to get advice about what to do and not to do in a provisional, then following the layout of similar patents online we filed.
Although I agree it's not the best solution, it's better than nothing and cost effective enough for a start-up.
Posted by: Megan Kamil | Aug 15, 2005 2:42:05 PM
Being a partner that funds largely on the quality of patens I would agree that if you do n't have patents then your business is worth a discount to the potential.
It is always good to end up with a portfolio around your actually property so that you are protected from derivitives. This then allows you to protect and hammer on other firms that are even close to your ip space.
Posted by: Wyly Wade | Aug 15, 2005 8:25:35 PM
