MGM vs Grokster
There's a ton of stuff in the blog world on this topic - the Supreme Court case in which MGM and the government is trying to shut down Grokster.
And most of it, as you'd expect, is pro Grokster.
Here is a link to the del.icio.us Grokster tag which has links to a bunch of good coverage on the case.
Apparently most of the Supreme Court case depends on how much of Grokster's usage is legal vs. how much is illegal.
I think this case must go in favor of Grokster and I am dismayed that our government would weigh in on the side of the past over the future, but I guess that is what conservative has come to mean.
The fact is that I use peer to peer file sharing networks for what I view to be legal uses all the time.
I have a vinyl version of The Rolling Stones Exile on Main Street at my beach house.
I have a CD of Exile on Main Street at my house in New York City.
I don't have a copy of it with me on vacation and I hadn't burned it into iTunes. I wanted to listen to it while I was reading the book. So I went to Limewire and got it. Is that illegal? I doubt it. I already own it twice. I can't imagine I need to buy it a third time.
The fact is that the whole notion of content ownership in physical form is an old idea. It's not relevent anymore. Content is bits for the most part now. And bits need to move from device to device. Peer to peer is the best way to make this happen. There are and will be more and more legal uses of peer to peer distribution systems every day.
If the Supreme Court falls into the same trap our mindless administration did, then it will be a really sad day in this country.
We'll have to go to China and India and Korea to do really innovative things.

Hey Fred,
Totally agree. But as the the illegality of your P2P file transfer. I would venture to say that the label would consider that illegal. You are provided a license to a specific instance of a song, be it on a CD, over iTunes, on tape, etc. Let's say you destroy a song on a CD by scratching it. As far as the label is concerned, you cannot just go and grab the file off Limewire to replace your damaged version. It's gone and you have to buy it again. I'm not saying it makes sense (except to the label), but I'm pretty sure that's how it works.
Posted by: Alex Rowland | April 03, 2005 at 07:06 PM
Maybe scratch India of that list. Legislative bodies are increasingly bending over to appease corporate lobbyist will a la US Congress. Sweden is a good haven.
Posted by: Rajesh | April 05, 2005 at 10:58 AM
Don't you know that innovation is a sign of a morally weak character. Shut up and pray, heathen swine!
Posted by: jackson | April 05, 2005 at 01:50 PM
If Clinton were still President, the US would be on the side of MGM as well.Most of the horrible copyright law we have was signed into law by Clinton.The Bush administration is just continuing Clinton's policy.
This is not a traditional left/right issue.The content industry successfully bribed all members of Congress from both parties.
Posted by: transgeek | April 06, 2005 at 02:06 AM
Si, eso que dicen algunos de ustedes es asi. Estoy de acuerdo en todo, menos en que es algo que es producto de la economia. Creo que eso es al reves.
Posted by: Alicia Minogui | May 06, 2006 at 12:18 PM