The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed)

« Walls of Mass Destruction (continued) | Main | HITs »

The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed)

I have seen the future of media and it looks like this:

Mashed Up Blog Posts at tech.memeorandum

Mashed Up Funny Videos at delicious

Mashed Up Playlists at webjay

Here is the future of media:

1 - Microchunk it - Reduce the content to its simplest form. Thanks Umair.
2 - Free it - Put it out there without walls around it or strings on it. Thanks Stewart.
3 - Syndicate it - Let anyone take it and run with it. Thanks Dave.
4 - Monetize it - Put the monetization and tracking systems into the microchunk. Thanks Feedburner.

Leaving aside the rights issues, which I know are large, if I were a television executive right now, I'd take my content, microchunk it, put a couple calls to a video ad server in the middle of it, and let it go whereever it wants to go, safe in the knowledge that whenever the show is viewed, I'll get to run a couple 15 second spots in the middle of it (which I could change whenever I wanted to and which I could measure).

This is where media is going and its not going to be stopped.

I know that Jason Calacanis hates the really simple stealing that goes on with Engadget or Autoblog posts. But you know what? He's not going to stop it. What he should do is monetize each and every post with an ad of some sort and a tracking mechanism of some sort and let the content flow.

RSS is a new medium. It's not like the web any more than the web was like print. Remember back in the late 90s when the media execs tried to use the web to sell more papers? It doesn't work. Content wants to be consumed in the media its delivered in.

So RSS content is not going to be used to send people to the web. It's going to be consumed in the RSS medium, whatever that turns out to be.

The data is pretty clear about this. The publishers that put only an excerpt of their posts/stories in their feeds get pretty low click thru on those excerpts. Those that put the full post in get a lot more readership.

So the trick is to figure out how to monetize RSS right in the medium, not as a way to send traffic back to the web where it can be monetized with the traditional web techniques.

Why did I decide to write this post today? Because in the last week I have gotten between five and ten requests to use my RSS feed in some sort of syndicated and mashed up RSS or web service. I've told all of them to go for it.

Here is the deal with my RSS feed. Anyone is free to use my RSS feed to produce whatever content they want to produce with the following exceptions. I do not want and will not allow my content to be used in pornographic or hate related properties. And the posts must be shown in their entirety with any advertising and tracking tools that I decide to use in them. And I must be given attribution for my work.

Other than that, go for it. Take it. And build something great with it.

November 5, 2005 Venture Capital and Technology | Comments (30) | TrackBack (39)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5934/3521973

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed):

» The future of media is here now from atmaspheric | endeavors
Leaving aside the rights issues, which I know are large, if I were a television executive right now, Id take my content, microchunk it, put a couple calls to a video ad server in the middle of it, and let it go whereever it wants to go, safe in... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 5, 2005 8:46:14 AM

» ON AMAZON'S MECHANICAL TURK: DEFINING WORK 2.0 from *michael parekh on IT*
WORK 2.0: MICROCHUNKING WORK 1.0 Who'd have thunk? That potentially the next best internet model since Google (via Bill Gross's GoTo.com/Overture efforts) could come from, not a bright-eyed, bushy-tailed, web two'ed start-up at 285 Hamilton Ave. in Pal... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 5, 2005 10:21:31 AM

» Il futuro dei media e gli RSS from SKY TG24 Pianeta Internet
Segnalo un ottimo post ricco di spunti sul futuro dei media in chiave rss. In sintesi: semplificazione, liberalizzazione, distribuzione e monetizzazione dei contenuti. Link: A VC: The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed). 1 - Microchunk it [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 6, 2005 9:31:29 AM

» ON MICROCHUNKING ECOMMERCE THE WEB 2.0 WAY from *michael parekh on IT*
LET'S SHOP TOGETHER Speaking of microchunking work and content (see post yesterday), how about microchunking commerce on the web? A starting point to see what this MAY look like eventually is Cribcandy.com, a social, visual, browser for stuff on the we... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 6, 2005 3:05:47 PM

» Take my RSS Feeds from Geek News Central
Where is the web headed today. From the perspective of a venture capitalist you would would think that if your company is not being innovative in creating segmented content, allowing it to be freely distributed and at the same time... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 6, 2005 5:02:50 PM

» RSS from Jason Preston
One of the hardest things to wrap my habits around is one of the easiest things to wrap my head around: RSS. Really Simple Syndication, which Im going to use here to stand in for any web syndication format (Atomthings I dont know... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 7, 2005 11:13:44 AM

» The Future of Media (aka Please Take My RSS Feed) from Docu-Blog/Steve's POV
Interesting post from Fred Wilson at AVC I have seen the future of media and it looks like this: Mashed Up Blog Posts at tech.memeorandum Mashed Up Funny Videos at delicious Mashed Up Playlists at webjay Here is the future of media: 1 - Microchunk it -... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 15, 2005 12:55:10 PM

» The Second Coming of Content and RSS Feeds from Read/Write Web
Feedburner CEO Dick Costolo has just posted what I think is a milestone post for RSS and Web 2.0: How feeds will change the way content is distributed, valued, and consumed. In it he expounds on the future direction of... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 21, 2005 2:10:53 PM

Tracked on Nov 21, 2005 2:28:56 PM

» Still in the First Coming of Library Feeds from The Shifted Librarian
The Second Coming of Content and RSS FeedsDave Winer recently pointed to a post by Adam Green, which explored similar territory. Adam thinks 2006 will be the year the Web explodes:"The explosion I am talking about is the shifting of... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 21, 2005 10:43:37 PM

» Fred Wilson Has Seen The Future of Media from ActoNetwork
And his vision is correct. His basic idea is to embed monetization opportunities in your content, and then distribute your content as far and as wide as possible. This is the f [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 24, 2005 11:22:58 AM

Tracked on Nov 24, 2005 11:23:27 AM

Tracked on Nov 24, 2005 11:23:59 AM

Tracked on Nov 24, 2005 2:35:16 PM

» Information Overload from Feedbridge Company Blog
Feedbridge is based on a simple and easy to understand premise; most people have too many information sources but would like to keep up with everything. This has led to many posts and backlash over rss and feeds from both mainstream media. I read Fred&... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 26, 2005 5:56:06 PM

» RSS growing pains from B2B Digital Media
As liberating as RSS can be for readers and publishers, incorporating it into your daily routine isn't as easy as it looks, and may take years before mainstream users adopt it, if ever. [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 27, 2005 10:24:19 PM

Tracked on Nov 27, 2005 11:54:51 PM

» ON MONETIZING EYEBALLS ANEW IN THE GOOD, OLD CABLE INDUSTRY from *michael parekh on IT*
TO BUNDLE OR TO NOT TO BUNDLE... While the A1 page lead story on Memeorandum is focused on Jason Calacanis's response to Om Malik's provocative article The return of monetized eyeballs in the Web 2.0 world, there may be another seismic change going on ... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 29, 2005 11:00:05 AM

» ON NEW RSS FEATURES FOR YAHOO! MAIL AND ALERTS from *michael parekh on IT*
MAKE IT SIMPLE RSS TechCrunch has a good overview of Yahoo!'s get together in San Francisco last night to announce new RSS feed and Alert options for it's upcoming Yahoo! Mail client, which remains in closed beta. What seems mundane at first glance is ... [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 30, 2005 5:52:10 AM

» Microchunks Are Great, But Stories Are Better from Mashalist
In posts earlier this month Fred Wilson and Jeff Jarvis wrote about microchunking content and using tags and social interaction to connect people with the content that’s relevant to them. These are the guys defining what it is to get,... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 1, 2005 4:24:06 PM

» NBA to Unlock its Content from Kareem Mayan's Weblog
The hot story on Memeorandum right now is that the NBA is going to make all of its video content available in a database so fans can search it, view it, and possibly create their own highlight reels. Being a... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 10, 2005 1:53:35 PM

Tracked on Dec 10, 2005 1:54:35 PM

Tracked on Dec 10, 2005 1:56:45 PM

» waves vs. particles from gapingvoid
From Fred Wilson:RSS has become a critcal fabric of the Internet, but it's still only something 5-10% of the Internet population knowingly uses. By that definition, "knowingly uses", the percentage may never change. But RSS is going to be used... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 31, 2005 6:53:30 AM

» snowballs are particles from gapingvoid
From Fred Wilson:RSS has become a critcal fabric of the Internet, but it's still only something 5-10% of the Internet population knowingly uses. By that definition, "knowingly uses", the percentage may never change. But RSS is going to be used... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 31, 2005 6:55:43 AM

» The Future of Media: Microchunks or Brands? from Tech Beat
VC Fred Wilson and serial entrepreneur Mark Pincus are debating what the next era of media will be. Fred think it's RSS-style microchunks of content that carry ads and are deliberately scattered to the Net winds to reach as many... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 13, 2006 1:31:27 AM

» Survey says: consumers prefer ads over $1.99 price for videos from Kareem Mayan's Links
http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=38366&Nid=17651&p=125863... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 13, 2006 6:56:45 PM

» Pub/sub TV from Nolan's Corner
One of the blogs I tossed into Google reader had a post about Internet TV. It made me think that some people need to get "out" more. The afore mentioned article quotes a Washington Post story about what the future of TV may look like. Basically it involve [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 14, 2006 3:40:56 AM

» Media 2.0 and Human Evolution from IP Democracy
A recent post by Scott Karp reminded me of the communication gap that sometimes characterizes debates about the future of media. While Scott raises some good points in Bloggers Are So Wrong About Media, I think he misses or dismisses... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 15, 2006 10:19:57 PM

» Media 2.0 and Human Evolution from IP Democracy
[Update:Scott Karps response to this post is available as a comment and is worth reading.] A recent post by Scott Karp reminded me of the communication gap that sometimes characterizes debates about the future of media. While Scott raises some... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 16, 2006 11:32:44 AM

» MSN Search's WebLog from MSN tests new blog, search features
MSN tests new blog, search features | The service will let users find blogs and syndicate content using the RSS format, as well as search blogs for specific ... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 7, 2006 2:39:25 PM

» Temporal Content (and Advertisements) Need Expectations from Genuine VC
By definition, the unique quality of temporal content (i.e. content that takes time to consume, like audio/video, either streamed or downloaded, either user-generated or “produced”) is that it cannot be easily scanned to quickly assess its value (like ... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 6, 2006 2:20:51 PM

» Четыре принципа зарабатывания денег на контенте в 21 веке from Воскресные байты
Изначально, эти принципы - как делать деньги в медиа-пространстве 21 века - сформулировал A VC в своем посте The Future of Media. Идею быстро подхватил... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 14, 2006 3:08:13 PM

» Spore - New Worlds, New Marketing from One Degree
A Google Video of Sim's creator Will Wright demonstrating his latest obsession Spore causes Ken Schafer to hyper-ventilate as he ponders why this might be the future of advertising. See for yourself... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 20, 2006 12:37:31 AM

» Terrible web strategy, part 2 from tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog
Over the weekend, Robin was telling me she wanted to keep a wishlist online. Amazons wish list is nice, but its exclusive to Amazon products (and Amazon partners). Why not have a wish list that could span multiple sites? To... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 23, 2006 10:44:33 PM

» The future of media is not difficult, but it can be scary from My Name is Kate
I love/hate it when someone else puts something I've been thinking into an incredibly simple and elegant mantra. Fred Wilson over at A VC has summarized the future of media.1 - Microchunk it - Reduce the content to its simplest [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 28, 2006 1:10:48 PM

Tracked on Apr 2, 2006 4:11:04 PM

» Opening Bell: 4.10.06 from DealBreaker.com
Wal-Mart Banking Plan Draws Objectors (AP) Surprise surprise. A bunch of folks whose businesses might be threatened are coming out against Wal-Mart's aspirations to start a bank. As we've stated before, a First Bank of Wal-Mart would shake up the... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 10, 2006 8:24:51 AM

» Microchunking Doesn’t Mean Microconsumption from Genuine VC
Umair Haque has been an evangelist for the microchunking of media content – reducing content to its simplest unbundled form. Fred Wilson built on that notion saying that the “Future of Media” is to microchunk it, free it, syndicate it, and monetize it.... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 10, 2006 7:25:19 PM

Comments

I think forcing the inclusion of ads breaks rule number 1 and possibly number 2. That's like saying Apple should sell the newest episodes of Lost with the advertisements included on the iTunes Music Store. Content and ads are two separate "chunks".

Posted by: Toby | Nov 5, 2005 9:03:17 AM

Fred,
The problem with all of this, and every one is just assuming that it will be solved, is that we still do not have a good solution on the market that brings relevent, effective advertising to all these little tiny content nuggets. We need a whole new system for matching advertisers with content that has low enough transaction costs to enable thousands or tens of thousands of media sources. Looking at the systems in place right now we have a long way to go. Adsense tries but still fails miserably.

Posted by: Zachcoelius | Nov 5, 2005 9:11:48 AM

Toby,

I am not saying that you need to monetize the microchunks. I am saying that you need to free them and syndicate them. Someone is going to monetize them and if you want it to be you, then you ought to build the monetization into the microchunks.

Posted by: fred | Nov 5, 2005 12:28:20 PM

Hi Fred

I've just emailed you too. We're in beta with a 'personalised news' website. You're featured, but not in full text. I know it's against what you've said above. I'd still like to feature you, though. Your thoughts on the biz is clear, accurate and very useful to a lot of people. www.bearstorm.com

Greg

Posted by: Greg Tallent | Nov 5, 2005 12:45:41 PM

a) We sure do have along way to go. Everything's headed for a point in time when all applications are web based, and computers work off an interlinked grid. Grid computing is nowhere near mainstream, which gives me an indication of just how far we have to go with this whole Internet thing.

b) Yep. Media rules have changed. I don't use any websites that don't have RSS. Too much hassle. I want the content to find me (not the other way around), I want to consume it in what ever form I choose and it's going to be a stretch for me to do anything differently.

c) Google has a beautiful vision of matching the right content with the right audience, at the right time with minimal friction. It's a wonderful thing because it's going to clear the world of informational clutter (i.e. advertising plastered Tokyo or NY Square). We don't need to be exposed to content we didn't ask for, and it's a stupid publisher who insists exposing us to it.

CPM is a term that ought to be outlawed.

d) Yep...I'd say there is plenty of room for solutions like AdSense, Fruitcast, Revver and anything else that monetizes user generated content (including this comment).

Posted by: Daniel Nerezov | Nov 5, 2005 12:50:55 PM

I agree that this works when you think about people reading your posts via RSS, but I suspect a lot of the benefit of microchunking comes from non-human interaction with your feed. By keeping the granularity of your output limited to just your content, you open a lot of doors for how it can be used.

Since I read your blog all the time, I could imagine wanting to put your rss feed on my MS Live page (assuming I would want one). If there are ads in the feed, that would ruin the aesthetic of my repurposing (repositioning ?) of your content.

Even though RSS is read by a lot of people directly, I think it's best to think of it as an API. If I had an object in java and I asked for it's description() I wouldn't expect to get an advertisement returned in the result. That would be a mixing of data that would render that method programatically useless.

Posted by: Toby | Nov 5, 2005 4:16:46 PM

We talked about free, radio quality mp3 tracks embedded in a player that anonymously phones home with each play back in 2000, but never got funded. :-(

Posted by: David Mercer | Nov 6, 2005 1:56:00 AM

You put ads in your content, I will filter them out before they reach my eyes or ears, or if I can't, I'll stop reading. I do not want to see ads EVER. If this means that you can't continue with the feed then so be it - ads are an egregious intrusion.

Posted by: xman | Nov 6, 2005 4:56:58 AM

Great post. I agree with most of it in spirit while I have my Entrepreneur hat on but as soon as I put my Engineer hat on there are a few problems.

1. Video can't be tracked once it's in the wild. There are no monitoring packages to detect when an .mpg is being viewed. It might be possible to build something into ANT or some of the standard viewers but only if the user knows that this is being sent back to the server. There would yield a huge privacy outcry otherwise.

2. If you want advertising in a feed reader that's certainly fine with me. I don't care. What about the CTR though? Most experiments I've heard of (and they are few because there aren't many people doing this) have shown that CTR within feeds it horrible.

3. What about sites like google news, tailrank, or memorandum that summarize content to be presented to the user. Your ads won't be shown.

4. What about pageranking and other types of gaming in your ads. Ads in RSS as content can really distort full-text search and the like. This applies to #3 to. I don't want your ad summarized and presented as your content. I don't think you want that either actually.

5. What about mobile devices? I don't necessarily mind your ads in on my laptop but they're a problem on my Treo.

Food for thought...

Maybe most of these issues could be solved if your ads were driven with a javascript include. Either that or the ad can be within a div that's marked as advertising. Then you can just use a license that requires the ad in all but certain situations.

Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Burton | Nov 6, 2005 5:57:11 AM

I've got no technical chops, but I just ran into this SuprGlu thingy last night, then read your post this morning. Interesting convergence.

here's SuprGlu and here's my version

Posted by: Bren | Nov 6, 2005 11:37:30 AM

The monetizing concept needs more work...

I read your blog in Outlook using RSSPopper. When I tried clicking on one of your google imageads, I got an error-page (http://imageads3.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/9C4hv9MueQU8s6JFLDPrzuL1G8U_?pos=0&r=1)
with the sage advise:

"One reason you may not be able to access this advertiser's website is because your web browser or email application is not configured to accept cookies.
...
If you're using Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express, you'll also need to select Internet Explorer as your default web browser."

Any ad-scheme that depends on the user changing behavior in order for the ad to be seen seems doomed to fail...

Posted by: Oskar Austegard | Nov 7, 2005 10:41:56 AM

RSS as an API for connecting sites is definitely a big step.

However, there's an inherant problem with sites, like SuperGlu, that sting together RSS feeds.

When you 'grab' a feed it's hitting that site as well as the site displaying the feed. It's causing twice as much effort.

Most Feedreaders grab RSS feeds on a scheduled basis. And Feedburner checks feeds every 30 minutes. This keeps the traffic down at the source.

But if Superglu and similar sites aren't using some sort of 'ping' service then they are causing more traffic than is actually needed.

One suggestion, however, before you add a feed to a personalized site built from feeds... put it in Feedburner first and then you can reduce the traffic and track your stats.

Posted by: Rick | Nov 7, 2005 2:36:13 PM

Advertising is everywhere, billboards, subways, sides of buildings, magazines, newspapers, television, etc. I will never support RSS if I am forced to look at ads. A social revolution is taking place on the web and I will oppose any and all attempts from you or anyone else who wants to hijack it for profit. Power to the people!

Posted by: abetterworld | Nov 7, 2005 2:38:33 PM

When it comes to copyrighted information, Copyright Clearance Center has been providing solutions for 27 years.
Our Rughtslink product is web tool that can follow the contnet wherever it goes or whatever microchunk the end user assumes.
The unique artilce meta data is captured and the user is presented with a variety of reuse options (permissions, reprints, e-prints, etc.
Publisher provides the terms, conditions and costs and viola! Instant permissions, instant payment= happy publisher, happy content user. Bill

Posted by: Bill | Nov 7, 2005 4:54:00 PM

Check out http://www.lifehacker.com/software/podcasting/podcast-advertising-with-fruitcast-135375.php

Posted by: CubikMusings | Nov 7, 2005 4:59:31 PM

I can't go with you on the copying issue, Fred. It makes much more sense for people who want to put content up to host it themselves, since this gives them the ability to do ongoing maintainance. For example, they can superimpose a credit sequence or ad on a video, take a song down when the promotional requirements have been achieved, add a pay-per-download charge, etc.

Posted by: Lucas Gonze | Nov 7, 2005 8:59:56 PM

An example of an RSS feed leading back to the website is Science Daily. Because I consider it the most valuable science news source anywhere, I have as an alternative gone to the work of programming with PHP (for personal use only) the conversion of the daily stories on the website into text files synchronized with my PocketPC using AvantGo and into text-to-speech mp3 files transferred to my mp3 player. The content then becomes a valuable part of my walk to and from work each day.

I filter out the ads on the html pages, but would have no problem with a one-sentence, a-la-PBS “Brought to you by…” statement in both text and speech formats. The sponsor could be automatically fitted to the area of scientific specialization covered in the story. I realize that people are not writing the text for free.

Mark

Posted by: Mark Poirier | Nov 8, 2005 11:50:10 AM

I dislike ads too but for the commentors here who say 'over my dead laptop' should explain the alternative revenue source to support content creators. For our personal sites, fine who cares, but if we want want professional quality content (news, music, video...) that implies someone with skills getting paid to produce it and (in the case of multimedia) hosting/distribution costs. People get hungry and cold, after all.

In the long run I don't believe advertising will bring enough revenue to the table to support all the myriad original and remix/mashup web services that people are dreaming up. Cable TV and satellite radio show that people will pay, to some extent, to remove ads but these markets also have huge intermediaries to collect the subscription fees; so far the only thing remotely like this on the web is the old AOL walled garden and no one who reads this blog is likely to be a fan of that service.

So micropayments? Still no good generalized solution for it. Abandon the Web (http://abandontheweb.blogspot.com/) has begun to ask this question, though no proposed answers so far.

Anyway, people who drop 'ads suck, put them in and I unsubscribe' comments without offering an alternative can kiss my... middle finger ;)

Posted by: BillSaysThis | Nov 9, 2005 2:36:37 PM

"3 - Syndicate it - Let anyone take it and run with it."
Right but how you do it. Do you know any tool that make it easy for others to syndicate your content on their site? If the answer is no you'd better check out http://www.stepwebz.com. At Stepwebz we provide an RSS syndication button you can put on your blog. When people click on it they are given the opportunity to display your feed's content on their site using a wide range of content tools such as news box, news tocker, news link... And the button comes with an affiliate program that enables you to earn money when you refer new members to StepWebz. We'd love your feedback and comment so do not hesitate to give it a try.

Regards

Rodolp S

Posted by: Rodolp s | Feb 10, 2006 8:57:30 PM

I agree with the general premise of your "future of media blog" post. However, you should perhaps close the loop with a 5th step that communicates feedback to the content producer, especially consumption patterns of microchunks among microniche consumer groups. This intelligence will prove extremely valuable to the content producer's strategic choices and allow them to produce higher quality content for greater consumption.

Posted by: Chiranjeev Bordoloi | Sep 23, 2006 10:10:31 AM

Posted by: Chiranjeev Bordoloi | Sep 23, 2006 10:15:24 AM

Investment information of all Canadian public companies. Market Activity, US Markets, Canadian Markets Pure Trading Announces Launch Date. Canada Stock Exchange became Worlds's sole exchange for the trading of senior equities.
http://www.CanadaStockExchange.Biz

Posted by: canada stockers | Nov 18, 2006 1:58:22 AM

USuggest.com allow the bloggers to make some extra money through recommended products directly from within their blogs, and hopefully directing their readers to online retailers. As such, the respective blogger would receive a commission from any sales generated through referrals!

Posted by: USuggest | Jan 22, 2007 3:06:23 PM

i think http://popurls.com now does the best job of aggregation

Posted by: Rick | Jan 31, 2007 12:06:28 PM

just visit this one

www.prasut.com

Posted by: catherine | Apr 20, 2007 6:22:17 AM

just visit this one

http://www.prasut.com

Posted by: pedro | Apr 23, 2007 7:37:59 AM

this one is here just for you

http://www.easyzarabra.com

Posted by: justine | May 9, 2007 7:26:01 AM

It’s very good article. Great site with very good look and perfect information.

Posted by: Usb flashdrive | Aug 5, 2007 6:21:19 AM

posting this using typekey.

Posted by: Fred Wilson | Sep 4, 2007 10:20:25 PM

There are many useful informations in this article. Thanks and greetings from Thuringia!

Posted by: dizi izle | Feb 21, 2008 4:53:03 PM

A VC

Musings of a VC in NYC