Paul Graham Talks to TechCrunch


  Paul Graham 
  Originally uploaded by niallkennedy.

I enjoyed the interview that Paul Graham did with TechCrunch.

I agree with most of what Paul says, in particular what he says about web 2.0 and developing products and services:

To me “web 2.0″ translates to “web.” And web technologies don’t appeal only to a small niche. Web-based email services have hundreds of millions of users. The network (in the broader sense of the Internet plus the phone networks) pervades everything now.

We’re pretty open about what we think makes a technology stick. We print it on T-Shirts: “Make something people want.” If you had to reduce the recipe for a successful startup to four words, those would probably be the four.

The only beef I'll take with the piece is this part:

It may not be a coincidence that both Flickr and Del.icio.us avoided the usual VC route.

Last time I checked Union Square Ventures was a VC firm and we did invest in delicious. But maybe Paul means we aren't a "usual VC firm". If so, that would be fine with me.

Comments

Sorry, Fred, what I meant about del.icio.us not taking the usual VC route was that it started as a hobby and grew virally for a long time before even turning into a company.

For the record, USV is on Y Combinator's list of hacker-friendly VCs.

1998: eyeballs, eyeballs, eyeballs…
2006: AJAX, AJAX, AJAX…

More “masterpieces”:
- create AJAX-enabled podcasts
- incentivize blogging network effects
- integrate user-centred ad delivery
- undefined citizen-media widgets
- integrate rich-client tagclouds
- post Cluetrain synergies
- share standards-compliant folksonomies
- beta-test A-list life-hacks
- remix data-driven web services
- post blogging blogospheres
http://www.emptybottle.org/bullshit/

Stop this madness! Solve real problems! There are lots of them… Create useful services!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment